Date
April 28, 2025, 11:10 p.m.
Failure - shmctl03
tst_test.c:1900: TINFO: LTP version: 20250130 tst_test.c:1904: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.15.0-rc4 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC @1745882138 x86_64 tst_[ 1229.018870] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=shmctl03 RESULT=fail> kconfig.c:88: TINFO: Parsing kernel config '/proc/config.gz' tst_kconfig.c:676: TINFO: CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS kernel option detected which might slow the execution shmctl03 shmctl03 shmctl03: [ 701.648442] /usr/local/bin/kirk[340]: starting test shmctl03 (shmctl03) shmctl03.c:33: TPASS: shmmin = 1 shmctl03.c:35: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax != 2147483647 got 4294967295 shmctl03.c:36: TPASS: /proc/sys/kernel/shmmni [ 1229.064967] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=shmctl05 RESULT=pass> shmctl03.c:37: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/shmall != 4278190079 got 4294967295
Failure - mseal02
tst_test.c:1900: TINFO: LTP version: 20250130 tst_test.c:1904: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.15.0-rc4 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC @1745882138 x86_64 tst_[ 1218.066736] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=mseal02 RESULT=fail> kconfig.c:88: TINFO: Parsing kernel config '/proc/config.gz' mseal02 mseal02 mseal02: [ 306.189801] /usr/local/bin/kirk[340]: starting test mseal02 (mseal02) mseal02.c:47: TPASS: mseal(0xf7d76000, 4096, 4294967295) : EINVAL (22) mseal02.c:47: TPASS: mseal(0xf7d76001, 4096, 0) : EINVAL (22) mseal02.c:47: TPASS: mseal(0xf7d78000, 8192, 0) : ENOMEM (12) mseal02.c:47: TPASS: mseal(0xf7d77000, 8192, 0) : [ 1218.134112] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=msgctl03 RESULT=pass> mseal02.c:47: TPASS: mseal(0xf7d76000, 16384, 0) : ENOMEM (12)
Failure - getxattr04
getxattr04 getxattr04 getxattr04: [ 212.675771] /usr/local/bin/kirk[340]: starting test getxattr04 (getxattr04)
Failure - ioctl_loop06
KNOWN ISSUE - LTP syscalls ioctl_loop06
tst_kconfig.c:676: TINFO: CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAG[ 1208.894972] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=ioctl_loop06 RESULT=fail> ioctl_loop06 ioctl_loop06 ioctl_loop06: [ 216.656646] /usr/local/bin/kirk[340]: starting test ioctl_loop06 (ioctl_loop06) ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK[ 1209.004045] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=ioctl_ns04 RESULT=pass> ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22) ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg > PAGE_SIZE ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg != power_of_2 ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size fa[ 1209.047854] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=ioctl_ns06 RESULT=pass> ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size < 512 ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22) ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_C[ 1209.091768] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=ioctl_sg01 RESULT=pass> ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)